I am using Mozilla 1.7 BTW.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 11:23
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [general] Multidoc API of all Commons
> 
> The packages links in the left pane do not work. For example:
> 
> - In the top left pane, click on "Codec 1.2".
> - In the middle left pane, click on "org.apache.commons.codec"
> -> nothing happens
> 
> Gary
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 22:30
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [general] Multidoc API of all Commons
> >
> >
> > There's been a request on our Wiki for a combined javadoc for a
while.
> > Part of the request is that we improve our cross-referencing, which
I
> > think we can easily do, but will take a bit of planning.
> >
> > However, the other part is for a combined front-end (I think). I've
> spent
> > today hacking around a bit and have come up with:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/~bayard/multidoc/index.html
> >
> > It's pretty easy maintenance, just give it a bunch of urls. Sorry
> > CLI/FileUpload, your javadoc were not in the usual Maven place and I
> > haven't tried hunting down correct ones yet.
> >
> > There's still effort needed to ensure we give it the right urls.
Many
> of
> > the ones I quickly generated are in fact for developer javadoc, not
> the
> > released javadoc. It'd also be nice to modify the format somehow to
> get
> > more than one version of the same API in there.
> >
> > It's written/hacked in Java. I started to think about it in Perl,
but
> I
> > prefer my Java scraping API too much to have to deal with something
> that
> > tries to parse HTML. It merely acts as a front end to existing
> javadoc; so
> > should be easy to grow to cover other parts of Jakarta/Apache
> (ECS/ORO?).
> >
> > Currently it's all static, so after a bit of cleaning it would quite
> > easily be something that could be hooked up to the Commons site. I'd
> like
> > to put a dynamic search in there, but that can come later.
> >
> > Anyway, any thoughts and opinions would be gratefully received,
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to