Robert, What do we need to do to push beanutils forward? Is it a case of reviewing the open bugs which are not Serverity "enhancement" and deciding what to do about them?
I'll review (at least some of) these tonight. Any I think I can help with, I'll try to make some time this week to fix them, although can't promise anything. As you pointed out beanutils is widely used, if I do fix any its probably best if I attach patches to the bugzilla for comment first before applying. Niall ----- Original Message ----- From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 9:27 PM Subject: Re: [beanutils] LazyDynaClass and LazyDynaBean Bug [29879] > On 5 Jul 2004, at 01:37, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > <snip> > > > The "Lazy" bean patches are two new dyna bean classes and involve no > > changes > > to existing code - plus there are two new junit test cases to test > > these > > classes. > > true > > > If I add these new classes in and someone comes back later and > > objects, they > > can always be removed if the objections can't be resolved. > > yep but i doubt they'll much need for that. > > i hope to get onto the beanutils release work this week. if you've got > the energy and the inclination, maybe you'd like to stick around and > help push beanutils forwards a little. beanutils has been very short of > developer energy for quite a while now. > > - robert > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
