I went ahead and named it splitPreserveAllTokens, since that seemed to be the closest concensus. It would be good if someone could review.
Steven Caswell Sun Certified Java Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling that thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." .... John Stuart Mill. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 2:35 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] StringUtils.split ignores empty items > (Bugzilla bug# 22692) > > > of splitPreserveTokens and splitPreserveAllTokens I prefer > the former, but am OK with the latter. > > Stephen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary Gregory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > So how about splitPreserveAllTokens. That might be a bit > verbose, but > it > > does convey exactly what the method does. > > Seems fine to me. > > Gary > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
