It scrapes them from the heading of the javadoc :) I was striving for maximum independence from maven/ant/gump or any other religion.
Sadly, javadoc is a pain in the arse. For projects that are single-packaged, it generates a stunted version, and in that case I only have the package name to use as a name. I wonder if we can generate full javadoc at all. Hen On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > Here's the latest multidoc of Commons. > > This is pretty cool! > > One question: Where do the strings in the top left box come from? Some > seem to be descriptive text, some are package names, and some look like > they're release version numbers. Looks like something we might want to > make consistent across components... > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/~bayard/multidoc/commons-multidoc/ > > > > It's intended to be released stuff only, but quite likely that cvs-head > > documents have found their way in as that will take a bit of organization. > > > > Xref, Xref-Test and JCoverage are supported ('Test Coverage'), but as > > Clover do things in a weird way, that's not supported yet. > > > > This is merely a wrapper on top of the live Commons javadoc. 304K for the > > whole thing :) It will still need some updating when new versions are > > released as package changes and name changes will affect it. Mainly it's > > the fact we have the version in the name that forces it to be kept up to > > date. > > > > Hen > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
