Hi Hernan, > [Hernan Silberman wrote:] > Just a quick query to check the staus/stability of the id > component.
With respect to the uuid package; everything is functional; however IMO it needs rework (all my naughty doings): - visibility, coupling, and maybe changes in package arrangement. I've been mentally blocked on it for a while. I'd like to add the persistence features Oliver Zeigermann suggested. The uuid's state classes could possible use a persistence abstraction at a higher level than where it is atm. If your using [id] I would recommend using some indirection - at least to the uuid functionality, so that if something changes you can manage it easily. Or pulling out what you need for now. The stuff Phil and Gary did is pretty eloquent/stable in my opinion. > Judging > from a quick look at CVS, things haven't changed too much > recently. Please let > me know if there are plans for a release in the near future. No release plans on the table. I do hope to have time in Sept to work on fixing the above if not sooner. Actually, if I wasn't architecturally challenged...probably more sooner. But no guess as to when a release might occur. Maybe Phil, or Gary, or others have more thoughts. Thanks, -TR --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
