Cool. I'll be working on the issue to clear up before release.
I'm happy to call it 1.0 as well, when the time comes. It's been stable enough.... On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:35:27 +0100, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i've no idea. we probably need to ask geir directly. we need a jexl > release, even if it's a 0.1. maybe we could ask geir if the current > code in CVS HEAD could be released at the same time. i'd be willing to > volunteer to act as release manager. > > - robert > > > > On 12 Aug 2004, at 08:18, Dion Gillard wrote: > > > The project.xml file for jexl says it's 1.0-beta-2 > > > > There is a 1.0-beta-2 jar on ibiblio, but nothing released from a > > Jakarta angle. > > > > I'm just wondering if the code in CVS is the same as that from > > 1.0-beta-2. There appear to be no tags on the source code. > > > > -- > > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
