The following issue has been updated:

    Updater: Hans Gilde (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
       Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 9:37 PM
    Comment:
Here's a demonstration of the problem.

Also, I'm working on a fix that will keep the one-tag-inplementation-per-thread system 
that Jelly wants, while stopping the memory leak.

The only thing is that the current use of ThreadLocal in TagScript doesn't look to me 
like it should cause a memory leak. Odd.
    Changes:
             Attachment changed to thread-local-memory-leak.zip
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
For a full history of the issue, see:

  http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-148?page=history

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-148

Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: JELLY-148
    Summary: Huge memory leak resulting from the use of ThreadLocal
       Type: Bug

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Critical

    Project: jelly
 Components: 
             core / taglib.core
   Versions:
             1.0-beta-5

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: Hans Gilde

    Created: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 9:34 PM
    Updated: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 9:37 PM

Description:
There is a huge memory leak that results from the TagScript's use of ThreadLocal.

ThreadLocal is usually used from a staic variable, while TagScript uses it from an 
instance variable. Although this looks legal to me, it causes a huge memory leak.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to