I think c) covers most everything. +1 for path c).
-Mark
Phil Steitz wrote:
There were not enough +1 votes to proceed with the release. Bug fixes were also applied during the vote. Therefore, we cannot proceed with the release at this time.
Three issues were reported with the release package:
1) Extraneous files (forgot to do clean co before release build - my bad) 2) Failing tests for French locale (pr #31325 - fixed in CVS) 3) Integer values not handled correctly by Frequency class (fixed in CVS)
The vote thread also included discussion of repackaging and/or API changes.
At this point, we can
a) Cut a clean release candidate including the fixes applied during the vote and restart the release vote
b) Cut an RC2 based on current CVS, vote on releasing this as a test release, similar to RC1. Follow with a 1.0 vote two weeks later.
c) Reopen discussion of API changes, agree on release plan, bundle changes into RC2, then do b).
My preference would be a); but if others have reservations, I am open to the other options as well. I would appreciate it if committers and other interested parties would weigh in with their opinions. Thanks in advance.
Phil
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Mark Diggory Software Developer Harvard MIT Data Center http://www.hmdc.harvard.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
