DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30855>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30855 [lang] Additional constructor for EqualsBuilder and isEquals member access. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 16:11 ------- Should it not be up to the user to decide whether s/he wants less code duplication vs. more processing? After all, "don't optimize before you measure, and then, don't optimize." It sounds like we are telling users that we are performing a design time optimization and not even providing the alt code pattern. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
