On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:31:25 +1300, Sharples, Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I doubt Eclipse will ever have built-in svn support because there are > > several third party plugins available. Since adding a plugin > > update site > > is so trivial in Eclipse I wouldn't think this would be a big deal. > > > > The plugin I use with Struts svn is http://subclipse.tigris.org/. It > > works largely the same as Eclipse's cvs plugin. > > I'm sure Eclipse *will* have built-in svn support at some point. If the > Subclipse plug-in provides more or less the same functionality as the > standard cvs plug-ins, and conforms to the VCM architecture, then there is > every chance that it could be hosted by Eclipse and provided as an > alternative to the cvs stuff. The key will be the adoption rate of svn in the > wider community - the more projects like Apache/Jakarta that use it, the > greater will be the demand for Eclipse to support it... >
It's a stated goal of the infrastructure team to get _all_ Apache projects moved over from CVS to SVN, for a variety of important reasons. A bunch of projects have already made the move, as you can see here: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN If you believe that tool support will follow adoption, then we'd be doing ourselves a favour by migrating sooner rather than later. Then the ASF can say "we use only Subversion for all our source control needs", which is a pretty powerful statement that SVN is here to stay in a big way. -- Martin Cooper > One of those chicken and egg things... ;-) > > Colin Sharples > IBM Advisory IT Specialist > Email: sharples-at-nz.ibm.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]