DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32343>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32343 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-03 09:34 ------- Hi Niall, > For me you still need to make the use-case for adding the additional > complexity. I don't see it as an issue to have to name fields uniquely on the > form - in fact it seems like a good thing to me. I think the use-case is that Struts form handling permits arrays of strings (or whatever). Before using Struts I found myself quite a few times having fields named: text1, text2, text3... when what I really wanted was a single text-field with multiple possible values. This is not a every-day use-case but it does happen. The truth is that I've only used it with text-fields, but I thought that it might be nice to have a general solution for all kinds of fields. Also, if these functions do work properly, I think the complexity of validator gets reduced as you can see in validateRequired and validateInteger I have provided. > You could raise a bugzilla for this after this enhancement suggestion is > accepted - it might anoy some people if you raise one against a feature that > isn't yet in Validator ;-) What I meant is that I am not sure I have placed this in the right place. Really, what I am proposing fits in validator. The thing is that, since your extension involves some js rewriting I thought it would be good to start a debate on this. > Also I'm still not sure how I'd integrate this into the javascript that this > extension is generating, but if it does get into validator you could submit a > patch with your bugzilla :-) I am willing to help if necessary no matter what happens with my proposal. I think your extension is a very good enhancement for validator. Nacho -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
