DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32691>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32691 Summary: Convenience methods for cleaner application code Product: Commons Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Logging AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wonder if the commons-logging guys could take a look at this log4j issue - http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16229 If commons-logging could provide the API that Linus suggests then it would add cleaner logging code to our applications and allow us to continue to use Log4J or whatever else as the underlying logger. I really don't know why the Log4J guys did nothing with this (even though they marked as fixed/resolved). It seems quite a reasonable request. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
