Re: [configuration]XMLConfigurations

[Oliver Heger]

Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Oliver Heger wrote:
If this is accepted, we can close the bugs related to 
XMLConfiguration messing up files on saving (31429, 32240). What do 
you think?

The last time I pondered if HierarchicalXMLConfiguration could replace 
XMLConfiguration there was something blocking but I can't remember 
exactly what, maybe the lack of a save() implementation you fixed 
earlier, I'll have to check. Do all tests for XMLConfiguration pass 
with HierarchicalXMLConfiguration ?

Emmanuel Bourg
I have now made HierarchicalXMLConfiguration fully compatible with 
XMLConfiugration. All tests for XMLConfiguration now run also with 
HierarchicalXMLConfiguration.

A thing that bothers me a bit is the fact that it is not too trivial to 
implement all the features of file based configurations (e.g. auto save, 
constructors) for HierarchicalXMLConfiguration because it cannot inherit 
from AbstractFileConfiguration. Maybe someone comes up with a more 
elegant solution?

If noone objects I will now go ahead and make 
HierarchicalXMLConfiguration the one and only XMLConfiguration we have.

Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]