Yes, the intent isn't to leave anyone behind. I just noticed that infrastructure changes don't have a section in the guideline proposal: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/proposal.html#decisions/items
From: Henri Yandell > well. Was thinking this qualifies again as a "release" majority vote. At first I thought that it should be consensus, ie) no -1's, but I'm seeing your thinking now. We have two types of -1; firstly there's a "-1 because I like CVS and want to stay there"; secondly there's a "-1 because I can't use SVN in the way I need to". The former should be treated as a majority vote, while the latter should be treated as a consensus vote. So I'm +1 to a "release" majority vote with the acceptance that we're not going to leave anyone behind. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
