On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:24:05 +1100, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From eclipse it's slower than using CVS.
Even (whatever the Eclipse equivalent is for) 'svn status', which doesn't have to talk to the SVN server, while the CVS equivalent does?? -- Martin Cooper > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:28:28 -0500, Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alright folks, it looks like svn has stabilized. > > > > Let's have a poll here: any more opinions on the svn conversion? Has > > everyone had ample time to test? > > > > Tim O'Brien > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
