DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33228>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33228 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-25 14:57 ------- Created an attachment (id=14095) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14095&action=view) Patch solving bug #33228 It seems that BeanUtils is bypassing its specifications (which is a good thing in this case). You can find it here: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/beanutils/commons-beanutils-1.6.1/docs/api/org/apache/commons/beanutils/package-summary.html#overview.background The good news is that the behaviour you want can be acheived with a couple of minor changes which in turn would bring consistency: * getAccessibleMethodFromInterfaceNest is checking for accesibility beginning with interfaces of the superClass and not the class itself. * MappedPropertyDescriptor is not checking for its interfaces' accesibility, it discards the method if it is not directly accessible. So both of these can be acheived by changing a couple of lines of code. The thing is that IMHO MappedPropertyDescriptor should have an init method to perform the common things that are done in its constructors. This would make it much easier to mantain. For the time being, the patch is attached with a slightly modified test case (separate attachment). Regards, Nacho -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
