DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28291>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28291 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-27 23:11 ------- I thought you had made a simple typo, hence my question "you mean point (2)?". Otherwise, the follwing two paragraphs do not make sense (to me). The discovery mechanism for commons-logging currently overlooks/assumes two points: 1. That the thread-context class loader is a child who's parent hierarchy includes the commons-logging.jar. 2. That the ClassLoaders in the current hierarchy exhibit the default parent-first behavior. Correction... my guess is that JUnit/Cactus are in conflict with point (1). That a thread context classloader is being set up that does not defer up a hierarchy that includes the commons logging code. I think in the second paragraph you meant to say: Correction... my guess is that JUnit/Cactus are in conflict with point (2). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
