Although... it would be fairly easy to adapt a new scripting language into Jelly. The fairly-simple task of implementing a pluggable language interface has been on the table for a while. I think that Morph would be an interesting candidate for a second language.
-----Original Message----- From: marc & lan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:37 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [Jexl & BeanUtils] Why not extend Jexl or beanutils to match same map syntax ? Matt Sgarlata wrote: > <shameless-plug> > > The Morph framework (morph.sourceforge.net) supports either syntax > out-of-the box. Morph had its first beta release yesterday. > > For a comparison of Morph to JEXL, see > http://morph.sourceforge.net/alternatives/jexl.html > > For a comparison of Morph to BeanUtils, see > http://morph.sourceforge.net/alternatives/beanutils.html > > </shameless-plug> It seems' to be a nice framework, but I'm working with jelly so need jexl :) Marc DeXeT --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
