The basic idea of catching ChainServlet up is sound, and I agree it should be done before the next release. I'll be able to look at this, but not until tonight.
To reduce confusion, I'd also like to think about deprecating the original configuration mechanism (the one that preceeded CatalogFactory and supported only one catalog) -- although we'd still have to leave it in for backwards compatibility, of course. What do you think? Craig On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:59:50 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 11:21 PM -0800 3/16/05, Craig McClanahan wrote: > >I'm fine with a 1.1 designation (there is a quite useful enhancement > >here) and will review the code and docs tomorrow for any useful > >updates. > > Craig, maybe you can have a look at > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34022 > > It was a response to Howard Lin's questions last week about using > ChainProcessor. As I got deeper into the code, the problem looked > less dire than I had thought, but I was leary about committing the > changes without some attention from someone who had either used the > ChainProcessor or who was in a better position to test them out. > > All of the other[chain] tickets in Bugzilla are enhancements. > > Joe > > -- > Joe Germuska > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blog.germuska.com > "Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
