DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-19 01:04 ------- Hi, I'm sorry there has been no feedback from other beanutils maintainers on whether this patch is appropriate for beanutils or not (as discussed in email thread on commons-dev). I've posted another reminder to that list. If no-one responds this time, then on return I'll just go ahead and commit the patch (well, once the issues mentioned on commons-dev are addressed). I am a little concerned about having // invoke non-static method invokeMethod(Object, String, Object[], Class[]) and // invoke static method invokeMethod(Class, String, Object[], Class[]) Because Class is also an Object, there seems potential for confusion. What do you think about changing the name of the new methods? invokeStaticMethod(Class, String, Object[], Class[]) etc -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
