The first one seems reasonable, and I agree with your comment on possible issue with Object[] and Class[] clashing.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:18:13 +1300, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > It would seem that the number of active beanutils committers has shrunk > significantly. > > Firstly, is there anyone who can spare 10 minutes to review these two > patches, and give a +1 (or not) to their inclusion in beanutils? I think > both are appropriate, but as I'm not a regular beanutils committer I > would like someone to second this. > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979 > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33980 > > The submitter of the patches seems keen, and I think we should try to > encourage that sort of thing! If no-one steps up to offer an opinion I > will assume *I'm* the new beanutils maintainer team and commit the patch > (well, once a few minor issues have been addressed). > > Sorry I can't provide a mail-archive link to the email threads on > commons-dev in which these patches were discussed; MARC does not appear > to be working at the moment. > > I have also noticed that the number of outstanding bugzilla entries for > beanutils is growing; the poor library is looking a little neglected. I > think it would be nice if people could spare a little time to address > these. I'm happy to be one of them, but would feel lonely doing it all > on my own. > > Note that I'm going to be away for three weeks very shortly, and don't > know if I'll have internet access. I wanted to draw some attention to > these items before I left.. > > Cheers, > > Simon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
