DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-18 21:57 ------- arg, Hi everyone, i finished my fix.. rexamined it.. and decided it wasnt clean at all. one of the issues i ran into was if we store the file URL .. if we do a setFileName or setBasePath should we also automatically update the URL... my quess is yes.. this is not.. but that leads to what to return when the user calls getBasePath currently if the user set the URL via setURL basePath returns a file://my file but if they use lets say a file object .. via setFile() then basepath returns c:/yourFile basepath is changing based on how the file path / name was set. So this creates a problem. Using the URL is a master reference we can still resolved the base path via configurationUtils.getBasePath(url) but it will no longer change based on how the values where initailly set. A) is this bad? b) should basepath be changing based on how the file / path was set anyways.? shouldnt it be more consistent? Really need some guidance here form the active members. Cause it looks like any solution to this bug is going to have minor functionality changes that im trying to avoid. J. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
