On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 19:39 +0200, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Isn't the term child-first a misnomer? A class loader can't be a child of > itself? Can it? > > IMO, the term "parent-last" is an improvement over child-first, > "parent-second" being even a little more precise.
hoped no one would notice that i changed my mind just after i sent that email :) - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
