from an uninvolved observer - I agree - and offer "commons-jgp" as a suggestion
robert burrell donkin wrote: >something like this has been needed for a while so it's great to see it >happening. > >but i do have some concerns about the name > >phil zimmermann's pretty good privacy program is almost universally >abbreviated to pgp. the name commons-pgp is not only close to a related >commercial product but the term PGP is plastered all over our >communications. i wonder whether it might be better to adopt another >name now (at this early stage) which doesn't carry the risk difficulties >later (for example: commons-openpgp, commons-crypt, commons-sign etc). > >- robert > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
