I actually overlooked your e-mail on this when I back through to decide if 
we had resolved everything and I apologize for that.

I don't have any problem with your prosal to make Ant 1.6 a prereq, so I'll 
put in my +1.

On 5/29/05, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Hello:
> 
> Note that RC7 does not change any of the issues in this message thread.
> The suggestions below cause one odd problem though: For the enum tests,
> an ClassNotFoundException is thrown when trying to load the Enum class
> from the custom built class loader. Weird.
> 
> Gary
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 12:08 AM
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FW: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under
> 1.4.2
> 
> Actually, assuming what is below is acceptable, using Ant 1.6 allows for
> a clean up to make the build.xml file shorter with:
> 
> <macrodef name="testit">
> <attribute name="classname"/>
> <sequential>
> <junit printsummary="true" fork="${junit.fork}"
> haltonerror="${test.failonerror}">
> <classpath refid="test.classpath"/>
> <test name="@{classname}"/>
> </junit>
> </sequential>
> </macrodef>
> 
> <target name="test.lang" depends="compile.tests">
> <testit classname="org.apache.commons.lang.LangTestSuite"/>
> </target>
> 
> <!-- Ditto for all test targets. -->
> 
> Any thoughts on making Ant 1.6 a build pre-req?
> 
> Gary
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:56 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FW: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under
> 1.4.2
> 
> Hello Steven and All:
> 
> Here is a fix for build problems on Sun Java 1.3.1 and 1.2.2.
> 
> Instead of using this odd way of invoking unit tests:
> 
> <target name="test.lang" depends="compile.tests">
> <echo message="Running lang package tests ..."/>
> <java classname="${test.runner}" fork="${test.fork}"
> failonerror="${test.failonerror}">
> <arg value="org.apache.commons.lang.LangTestSuite"/>
> <classpath refid="test.classpath"/>
> </java>
> </target>
> 
> I changed this target on my machine to the more standard JUnit
> invocation:
> 
> <target name="test.lang" depends="compile.tests">
> <echo message="Running lang package tests ..."/>
> <junit fork="${junit.fork}" haltonerror="${test.failonerror}">
> <classpath refid="test.classpath"/>
> <test name="org.apache.commons.lang.LangTestSuite"/>
> </junit>
> </target>
> 
> The test passed on 1.4.2_08, 1.3.1_14 and 1.2.2_017.
> 
> Shall I (or Steven) change the JUnit invocation style for all tests?
> 
> Gary
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:07 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: FW: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under
> 1.4.2
> 
> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 20:05 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
> > That is so very odd. I'm at a loss to explain it. I don't have access
> to a
> > system with JDK 1.3 so I'm not able to try it. Maybe someone else can
> try?
> 
> I've also tried building with JDK1.2.2 on linux.
> 
> I got this as part of the output
> [java] Java 1.3 tests not run since the current version is 1.2.2
> and also got the DateUtilsTest.testRound failure.
> 
> No other problems were encountered.
> 
> If Gary is running tests on Windows, then his problem might indicate a
> windows-specific issue. Otherwise it looks to me like a system-specific
> problem with Gary's setup.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Simon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org

Reply via email to