DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35181>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35181 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-06 21:44 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > having trouble deciding whether it's a good thing or a bad thing to allow for > "slop", maybe that's a sign that we need a "slop-mode" option in > FTPClientConfig > (probably named differently)? Perhaps something similar to how > SimpleDateFormat.isLenient() exists because one size does not fit all? That sounds like a good compromise. Every time we've tried to impose a single way to handle this sort of thing, we always seem to get bitten by some special case (curse FTP and its unspecified listing output! :). Letting the API user decide if he wants a looser "slop"-handling interpretation of dates provides sufficient flexibility for programmers to work around special cases without forcing the API to be all-knowing. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
