On 6/9/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry..... > > I saw square brackets, "release" and +1's from the jelly developers and > saw that as a green light. My mistake.
Even though the thread had [proposal], I still took it as a vote for an RC2. So apologies there from me too. > I was going to come back and follow the doc to do the distributions and > so on, as I had run out of time last night, but I'll hold off here for now. > > Options: > - pull these all back down again, start again with an RC3 vote? > - put up a retrospective [vote] thread and once ok, finish the RC2 > release from the tag. > - use the published JAR (it is in java-repository, so is under dist but > not on the downloads page or up as a tarball) as an RC in the > traditional sense according to the commons doc and put forward a vote > for 1.0. > > I'm in favour of the last one as it is closer to the commons doc, and I > never liked the practice of naming something a release candidate when it > isn't really ready for a final release anyway. > That will depend on whether the other Jelly people think it is ready - > I'm only able to look at it from Maven's perspective. Along those lines, > if anyone else is interested in preparing the releases, please say so. I > can chip in the time to get it done or help if needed, I was just > stepping up here because everyone else seemed busy. I'm good on the last option too, FWIW. Thanks for jumping in Brett. -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ "You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live." - George Bernard Shaw --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
