DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35774>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35774 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-19 19:03 ------- I won't have time today to code anything up right now but I have been thinking and playing around with various exotic cases (such as the JCA). I suspect that the problems in these cases arise when (as in this case) code has been loaded is a sibling (or cousin) load to the application code. In this case, TCCL either cannot load the implementation classes or when it can load them but they are defined by an incompatible loader. I think that it should be possible to diagnose this case by checking the Log class loaded by TCCL. If it cannot be loaded or is not compatible with the Log class loaded by the class classloader, then TCCL should not be used by JCL. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
