DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35858>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35858 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-27 20:29 ------- I committed a fix, which should solve the original problem (there was a bug in the CloneVisitor, which also affects the clone() method). About removing the subset() method at all: I think, this would work. SubsetConfiguration only adds the correct prefix and passes the key then to HierarchicalConfiguration, which correctly interprets indices. The subset test in TestHierarchicalConfiguration also tests such complex keys. Just adding the subset's nodes to a new HierarchicalConfiguration as you do in your alternative implementation will probably cause trouble with clearing property values: Here a node's parent reference is used for removing the child node. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
