From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > >I believe we are probably the only people in apache-land with versions of > >these reports that work! > > > The report works as long as there have been no cvs2svn imports in the > last 30 days. That's not currently the case, but it will be by the end > of Jan :)
Is that because the whole of Apache will have moved to subversion by then? > This is a reasonable fix, but it is not going to perform well for files > with a lot of revisions. Yes I agree. Maybe its useful temporary solution for small commons components? Do you think it worth making more widely available and if so, what would be the best way? > >Do we want to stick to showing changes in the last 120 days? Previous > >versions of validator we're branched on 17th April 2004 - so if we wanted to > >show all changes in Validator 1.2.0 then we could set the period to > >something like 524 days? > > > > > These seem like too much to me. Do you really need SCM changes since the > last release? Isn't the bugzilla report better for that? Yes you're probably right. > - Brett Thanks for your comments. Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]