DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35858>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35858 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-30 13:26 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > About removing the subset() method at all: I think, this would work. > SubsetConfiguration only adds the correct prefix and passes the key then to > HierarchicalConfiguration, which correctly interprets indices. The subset test > in TestHierarchicalConfiguration also tests such complex keys. I added a test that fails if the subset() implementation is removed: assertEquals(fields[0][0], subset.getProperty("name(0)")); I haven't looked why it doesn't work with a SubsetConfiguration. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
