I just published an RC4-SNAPSHOT jar to cvs.apache.org/repostory -- commons-math-1.1-RC4-SNAPSHOT.jar
This is not (yet) an RC, as I am still working on BZ 37086. It does include other bug fixes after RC3, though, so I thought it best to publish a snapshot rather than pusing the RC3 jar. One correction below. References to "java-repository" mean the mirrored, ibiblio-synched official release repo at http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/. This is all described in the "Repository Structure" section in http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/building.html Phil On 10/15/05, Mauro Talevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > > > > There is general consensus that it is OK to publish snapshots to our > > "internal" repository at cvs.apache.org/repository (aka > > "java-repository"), but not to ibibilio. The snaps on cvs.apache.org > > are not guaranteed to remain there and users should not be encouraged > > to use them in production applications. Others can jump in here and > > state different opinions, but I think at least within commons we are > > in agreement that we publish only released jars to ibiblio. > > > > Some apache projects vote on and release formal betas and some > > separate release votes from stability votes. At this point, in > > commons, we follow the process described here: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases, which is to fix contents > > of the release via a release plan, then cut RCs for download / > > inspection from people.apache.org, iterating until a full release vote > > passes and we publish to apache mirros and ibibilio. > > > > This process and the Jakarta voting / release guidelines really > > predate maven. It may be reasonable to add a "push RC jars to > > java-repository" to the RC process. If other commons committers are > > OK with pushing RC jars to java-repository, I will do this for the > > current [math] RC and update > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases to add a "publish to > > java-repository" step to the RC step. This creates a little more work > > for RMs, but if it means the RCs get more / better testing and we are > > all OK with it from support / oversight perspective, I am OK with it > > That'd be great! java-repository is just as easy to add it to the list > of maven remote repos. > > Thanks! > Cheers > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
