2005/10/28, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Oliver Zeigermann <oliver.zeigermann <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > I do not think it should be too difficult, but what would be the real > > benefit? The XA resource would store files locally only and a real 2 > > phase commit does not work with the transactional file system. > > I guess it is less a question of correct working than of integration. We have > the need to run database updates, to execute Corba services and to modify the > filesystem in transactions. From what I get (it's my first real contact with > transactions not limited to databases) most of the TransactionManagers are > based > on Sun's JTA which is again based on the XA specification. So wrapping an > existent transactional file access within a XAResource would be the simplest > way > to go, wouldn't it?
Sounds correct to me. > > Anyway, if you have a decent running implementation of that and want > > to donate it to the commons transaction project, I'd be my pleasure to > > add it. > > Not yet :) Let me know when you have anything or want more discussion about the topic! Oliver --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
