DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32360>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32360 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-02 05:56 ------- Who would've thought that this issue would turn into such a bloodshed. We now have two diametrically opposite sides. Of course, we'll make a decision at some point and one of the two sides will lose. :( That's unless somebody can come up with an idea for a peacefull resolution. Elliott: - How can we make Richard and those who agree with him happy? - What project(s) will suffer, more specifically will choose not to upgrade to JXPath 1.3 or switch to a different implementation of XPath if we keep registerDefaultNamespace()? Richard: - How can we make Elliott and his cohort happy? - What project(s) will suffer, etc. if we revert the change and leave registerDefaultNamespace() out? Are there workarounds? Let's try to find consensus. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
