DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37379>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37379 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-14 16:11 ------- Hello Oliver, had another idea: The Javadoc for the urlEncode parameter on the constructor says: "if set to <code>true</code> encodes all paths to allow for any kind of characters" The Javadoc for the idMapper parameter on the constructor says: "idMapper mapper for resourceId to path" So it is not quite clear if it can be assumed that the idMapper is also used for the transaction IDs. While there is no restriction for 'urlEncode' there is one for 'idMapper'. My idea was to use the idMapper also for the transaction IDs if 'urlEncode' is set to true or if a idMapper id passed. This might be a useful default implementation. Or is the ResourceIdToPathMapper supposed to do something very special that can not be applied to transaction IDs? In any case the Javadoc for the constructors should be clarified. WDYT? Jörg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
