DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37086>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37086 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-23 19:02 ------- Current behavior has been documented. No attempt has been made to implement C99x Annex G for the following reasons: 1. Spec is not publicly available and we have not been able to get permission to quote from the spec in javadoc or to share the spec with the development community. 2. Spec is for the C language and Annex G is still not normative. 3. Following the spec complicates and has performance impacts on implementations. 4. Following the spec introduces semantic incompatibility with version 1.0 of commons-math. The user guide and javadoc have been updated to reflect the following principles: * Operations invoked on arguments having any NaN parts always result in Complex.NaN returned; * Infinite values are handled according to the rules for java.lang.Double arithmetic, resulting in NaN or infinities returned in parts of Complex results per the computational formulas provided in the method javadoc. So...for now closing as WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
