On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 10:14 -0500, Eric Pugh wrote: > I agree with the 1 year mark. I know that there are projects that I > haven't worked on for six months until the itch came back and I had > to scratch it! Is there any reason to remove committers? > Performance? Security? It seems to raise a barrier to reentry for > dormant committers.
i'm also a little concerned about barriers to (re-) entry: the higher the barrier to re-entry, the more strain this places on the core commons committers. in terms of removing commit access, 6 months seems too short but is probably too long to help to highlight problems with components. 1 year is more acceptable but IMHO this is a jakarta-wide issue. but i agree with the general strategy. we need to find out when the number of active committers reaches a minimal threshold. a more pressing problem is voting: there have been a number of votes which have failed due to apathy. given the new understanding about the legal status of pmc's, the commons voting procedures are now seem out dated. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
