Shouldn't that be "no substantive issues"? ;-)

robert burrell donkin wrote:
i'm now +1

i'd like to thanks rory for his quick response. i'm now satisfied that
there are substantive issues with the net code and so i'm happy to
change my -1 to a +1.
- robert

On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:08 +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote:
-1 to any commons-net new release. see pmc thread for details (if any
committers aren't on the pmc please shout and i'll nominate you)

- robert

On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 07:47 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
As I have little time now, I propose the following. 1.4.1 will be just 1.4.0 with whatever changes are needed to reverse the dependency on jdk 1.4.x. No other bug fixes will be included.

Re-vote

+1 [yes]
-1 [no]
+1

---
Mario


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to