Right! Sorry! On 12/15/05, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dakota Jack wrote on Thursday, December 15, 2005 7:01 AM: > > > You are assuming that there will be a time difference in millis > > between the two time calls. System.currentTimeMillis() takes a > > relatively long time to return. So, I would not trust that > > assumption. > > No, I just assume that the millis are the same or greater. This implies > that the clock does not walk backwards (or you hit the millis overflow when > running the test). > > - Jörg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
