Hello Andrea:
I have your patch installed on my machine but I want to make sure I
understand the intent. In your example:
public class MyException extends Exception {
public MyException(String msg) {
super(msg);
}
public MyException(String msg, Throwable cause) {
super(msg);
ExceptionUtils.setCause(this, cause);
}
}
If this code runs in a JRE >= 1.4 , the cause is set in the target.
If this code runs in a JRE < 1.4, nothing happens.
So the code is portable but the behavior is different.
Is the intent to write code in a JRE < 1.4 that will behave OK on a JRE
>= 1.4?
Why not subclass NestableException and get the portability AND the
proper behavior?
Thanks,
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrea Rombaldi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:44 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] [PATCH] new ExceptionUtils.setCause() method
>
> Hi,
>
> this is just a reminder for my trivial patch :-)
>
> Ciao,
> Andrea.
>
>
> > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG*
> > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> > <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37574>.
> > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND*
> > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37574
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-06
> > 01:19 -------
> > I'll try to take a look this week.
> >
> > --
> > Configure bugmail:
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> > ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
