Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Oliver Heger wrote: > >> I noticed several projects recently switching to cobertura for their >> code coverage reports. >> >> I tried cobertura, too, and was very content with the results. ATM in >> configuration we use jcoverage, but this product seems to have some >> problems, especially with inner classes. So I would suggest switching to >> cobertura, too. >> >> Would it make sense to define a standard coverage analysis tool for all >> commons components? If so, which other products could be candidates? > > > I looked at Cobertura quickly (http://cobertura.sf.net/sample), it > seems that Clover provides more coverage information regarding the > evaluation of the conditions (i.e the expression in a "if" statement > has been evaluated n times true and 0 time false, meaning the > behaviour when the condition is false is untested). > > The report generated by Cobertura looks better than JCoverage though. > > Emmanuel Bourg > With clover there seem to be some licensing issues:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37454 Oliver --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
