DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38026>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38026 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 05:58 ------- The Hashtable is synchronized using synchronized keywords on the methods, which means that that lock object is the instance itself. As such, everything is waiting on the same lock, so releaseAll is safe because it synchronizes on the instance before manipulating anything and the other mutation points, like the cacheFactory method would be blocked during a Hashtable.put if releaseAll were in process. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
