--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/14/06, Tim OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip/> > > 2. Decouple Execution Context from the SCXML Model > > <snip/> > Most of your observations are correct. We need effective cloneability > and/or decoupling, re-parsing is a waste. If you have any ideas, do > let me know. I'll spend some time on this during the rest of the week, > primarily just starting a new thread here, will clip the email length > in the next posts. > Created a place holder issue for the task of identifying the appropriate way to do this: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38311 Do you want to take a stab at this? I had some ideas about the semantic impl, should we both try out some ideas independently in two different branches and then see what bubbles out of independent effort? > This actually was one of the things I had in mind between sandbox > graduation and release. > And, this is I guess one of the central issues with releasing scxml into commons (again, not that I disagree with it being in the commons). Althogh I think there is some room for flexibility after a release, commons components are limited by the fact that we haveto try to maintain compatibility between major releases. Becuase of this, I think that the public interface of scxml needs extra scrutiny before a release (and to me the 1.0 release happens at the same tie as promotion). > -Rahul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
