On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 01:06 +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 19:22 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > On 1/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Author: rdonkin > > > Date: Sun Jan 22 15:26:41 2006 > > > New Revision: 371420 > > > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371420&view=rev > > > Log: > > > Upgraded version number in preparation for cutting first candidate > > > > > > Modified: > > > jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml > > > jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/project.xml > > > > > > Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml > > > URL: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml?rev=371420&r1=371419&r2=371420&view=diff > > > ============================================================================== > > > --- jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml (original) > > > +++ jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml Sun Jan 22 15:26:41 > > > 2006 > > > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ > > > <property name="component.title" value="Logging Wrapper > > > Library"/> > > > > > > <!-- The current version number of this component --> > > > - <property name="component.version" value="1.1-dev"/> > > > + <property name="component.version" value="1.1"/> > > > > > <snip/> > > > > I would not expect a value of "1.1" to show up here unless you're > > actively cutting a release ATM, which seems improbable. Did you mean > > "1.1-RC1" or something to that effect? TIA for clarifying. > > i was planning to use a variation of the httpd/tomcat/struts style > release process. my reason is that JCL is *very* widely used and any > mistakes will be *very* bad news. this release process works a little > differently to the releases usually cut here in the commons. > > basically, the same artifact is voted from RC->alpha->beta->final. this > has advantages since the JCL release process cannot be fully automated > (it needs two different JVM versions). i'll post more on this tomorrow.
i've had a little chance to think on this and given the difficulties that we've had in the past with stray jar's being uploaded places, i think that for libraries, it's important to distinguish between full official release from others. so, i'll go back to using RC, alpha and so on. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
