Hey, I'm sorry too, but I don't have time at the moment either. -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:44 AM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [jelly][vote] APT tag library
No problem. I'll take it in that direction, then. Thanks for the help! -Ryan > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 2:01 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library > > Dear Ryan, > > I am sorry nothing more has happened. > At this point, as of me, i am stuck into the fact that I develop on > places where Java 1.5 is not available and have very little > experience > of it. > If some other jelly committers do not show an interest to it, I am > afraid I will have to suggest another home as you were > hinting earlier. > > paul > > PS: other help on jelly development is also welcome ! > > Ryan Heaton wrote: > > This issue and proposal has been in JIRA now for about a > month. Activity (perhaps interest) has been minimal. > > > > At this point, I'm not sure what to do. Those who have > shown interest have been positive about the proposal. Can (should) we > > reinitiate the vote? Are the votes that have been offered > adequate to continue? > > > > -Ryan > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ryan Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 11:44 AM > >> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: RE: [jelly][vote] APT tag library > >> > >> I have created a JIRA issue with a comprehensive description, > >> and I've included some examples on what this new tag > library can do. > >> > >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-225 > >> > >> Comments would be appreciated. > >> > >> -Ryan > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:10 PM > >>> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > >>> Subject: Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library > >>> > >>> Ryan, > >>> > >>> The idea of making it a jira issue is that it's a place you > >>> > >> can post > >> > >>> to... and that people can see and comment on. > >>> I'd put there a tag-library similarly packaged to others in > >>> jelly/jelly-tags/. > >>> > >>> How does it sound ? > >>> > >>> paul > >>> > >>> Ryan Heaton wrote: > >>> > >>>> I have not posted a jira issue. I was not aware that was needed. > >>>> > >>>> You'll have to be patient with me, I really have no idea > >>>> > >>> how the process to add a component works. I would be happy > >>> > >> to proceed > >> > >>>> through whatever formal process has been established. If > >>>> > >>> someone could explain to me what needs to happen, I'd be > >>> happy to drive > >>> > >>>> it. > >>>> > >>>> I don't even mind if the component isn't wanted in the > >>>> > >>> commons, I'll put it in sourceforge otherwise. From where I > >>> stand, I've got > >>> > >>>> something cool, I believe it will be very useful to many > >>>> > >>> people, and if you want it as part of jelly, I'm willing to > >>> submit it and > >>> > >>>> even to maintain it. > >>>> > >>>> Please advise. > >>>> > >>>> -Ryan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:17 AM > >>>>> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > >>>>> Subject: Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm slowly catching up on this. > >>>>> Maybe we need to have life with Ryan a bit longer before > >>>>> > >>> becoming a > >>> > >>>>> committer. > >>>>> In order to send a fully fledged component proposal, Ryan, > >>>>> > >>> dare I ask > >>> > >>>>> whether you've posted a jira issue already ? > >>>>> This is really needed for all to look at. > >>>>> > >>>>> thanks > >>>>> > >>>>> paul > >>>>> > >>>>> robert burrell donkin wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:48 -0700, Ryan Heaton wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm adjusting the thread subject to reflect the fact that > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> there is a vote going on for two things: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> 1. Acceptance of the new APT tag library (described below) > >>>>>>> 2. Acceptance of me as a committer to support the new apt > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> tag library, if it gets accepted. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> So far, I have recorded three people voting positive for > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> both proposals: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Dion Gillard > >>>>>>> Hans Gilde > >>>>>>> Paul Libbrecht > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> hi ryan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> (sorry to have to start being a little legalistic...) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> i know that this can be a little confusing but there > >>>>>> > >> are votes and > >> > >>>>>> VOTEs... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> both of these need to be official ASF votes. these need > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> more formality > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> that just vague +1's against your proposal. the subject > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> should be [VOTE] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> (jelly isn't necessary since VOTEs are commons-wide and may > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> result in > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> some filters not recognising your post as a vote thread). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> we're really only getting up to speed with the new > processes for > >>>>>> accepting code which is not original so you might need a little > >>>>>> patience. so, apologies in advance... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> i'm not sure there's any consensus about the best way > >>>>>> > >> to approach > >> > >>>>>> software grants but i'd expect to understand the > >>>>>> > >> provinence of the > >> > >>>>>> donated code before i'd be willing to +1. i'd also > >>>>>> > >> expect a jelly > >> > >>>>>> committer to start the VOTE thread. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> it's not really possible to have conditional approval for a > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> committer > >>>>> and it's poor netiquette to nominate yourself as a > committer. > >>>>> > >>>>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
