Steve

Agreed that JDK 1.3 (and previous) is still important to support. My question is: is it desirable to put a 1.4+ version on HEAD and relegate JDK 1.3 to a separate branch, or do we not want to get into separate branch maintenance?

R

Steve Cohen wrote:

Rory Winston wrote:

Hi

I have been following the email threads re: JSSE and FTPS functionality. I think that this might be a good point to consider introducing a version of Commons-Net that uses JDK 1.4+ as a baseline. My reasoning is as follows:

* We could remove the (oro) jar dependency;
* FTPS support would not necessitate a separate (JSSE) jar dependency;
* It could be a good opportunity to "clean up" the threading code and socket handling, and make use of NIO; * It also may be easier to incrementally add new functionality, such as Proxy support

Of course, JDK-1.3-compatible releases could still continue on HEAD, or we could move the 1.4+ branch to HEAD and the 1.3 code to a maintenance branch.

As a simple proof-of-concept, I have set up a sandbox branch and made some minor enhancements, including:

* Changing oro-dependant code to use Java regex code instead

Any comments?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



The only negative I can find is that our contributor of the FTPS stuff badly wants 1.3 compatibility. And I have a feeling that he's not the only one. 1.3 is not yet End of Life according to Sun, although it will be soon. My sense is that we lag Sun by some interval of time on these issues. I don't think we're going to be able to get away with saying "no more enhancements for JDK1.3" for awhile. So this will probably mean maintaining two branches for some time.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to