DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38435>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38435 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 01:29 ------- Could be room for both; or I am OK replacing the CompositeIdentifierGenerator with this. The use cases that I have run into have involved a random part and a sequential part; or a date/time plus sequential, which could not be done this way; or (not covered by either of these) a random part followed by a hash (with salt) of the first part so the id could be verified to be authentic. It is a little awkward to introduce a "ConstantIdentifierGenerator" to make the Composite setup work for the special case of prefix / suffix. What do others think about these? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
