Based on that description, +1. If it hasn't even reached 1.0, I don't think it should be in proper.
- Brett Henri Yandell wrote: > What to do with Latka? > > It's failling to build in gump at the moment, it's not had a release > in 2 and a half years, and that was 1.0-alpha1. Presumably its only > release, based on the tags in svn - and lastly I don't think there are > any active developers. > > Digging in SVN, I'd hazard that it was last really active over 3 years > ago. Its eponymous class - Latka - was last seriously edited over > three years ago. > > My thought is that we should relegate it to the sandbox's dormant section. > > Any thoughts? > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
