"Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Bill Barker wrote: >> Well, Gump doesn't currently support Maven 2, so moving to an *only* >> build >> with Maven 2 would pretty much cripple Gump. > > I think Maven 2 support in Gump should be on this list of prereqs. >
Well, I'm only making progress slowly in understanding Maven 2 enough to create a plugin for the Repository that points to the Gump-built jars instead of the one declaired in the POM. If nobody that actually knows Maven 2 wants to step up on [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's going to be a long time before this happens ;-). >> >> That aside, I personally have no interest in Maven, so won't help for the >> projects I'm involved with (daemon & modeler), and will veto removal of >> the >> ant build scripts from either. > > I don't think anyone is saying that Ant scripts should be removed if > there is someone to maintain them. As a last resort, the "mvn ant:ant" > output should do a sufficient job for gump. > Actually, I understand that modeler won't build under Maven at all, and the daemon ant script is also unrelated to the (brain-dead) output of Maven. > - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
