You can change that also in the m1 poms. If there're already releases we can relocate the to the new groupid, so people using the old one will get a warning althoug still working.
On 2/27/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex Karasulu wrote: > > Hiya, > > > > The directory project depends on commons-daemon 1.0.1 and we had to > > update the maven2 repo with a temporary pom.xml to allow our recent > > release to go through. I wanted to contact this list and make sure the > > deployed pom is correct. It is located here: > > > > http://test.maven.codehaus.org/maven2/commons-daemon/commons-daemon/1.0.1/ > > > > Also I'd like to make sure we can get m2 deployments working for commons > > daemon from now on. I'm a committer but I wanted to ask if it's ok to > > add a m2 pom alongside the m1 project.xml so we can update the m2 > > repository. > > If we start to add m2 poms to SVN I do think we should use the Maven 2 > way to declare groupId, like this: > > <groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId> > <artifactId>commons-daemon</artifactId> > > -- > Dennis Lundberg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
